All scores

Transparency Score

How complete and detailed a city's public financial disclosure is.

64
San Ramon, CAExample citySee the profile
Version2027.3
Coverage8,099 US cities
UpdatesAnnual
DirectionHigher = more open

Definition

The Transparency Score measures how openly a city handles public money, in two parts. Accountability: does the city get its finances audited on time, with clean results, and report them to the federal government? Disclosure: does it publish a complete, detailed budget residents can read?

What goes into it

ComponentWhat it capturesSource
Audit timelinessHow soon after its fiscal year ends the city files its federal single auditFederal Audit Clearinghouse
Audit resultsWhether auditors gave a clean opinion, and whether they reported material weaknesses or doubts about the city's financesFederal Audit Clearinghouse
Financial reportingWhether the city reports its own finances to the Census Bureau, rather than the Bureau estimating themCensus government finances
Budget disclosureHow completely the city's adopted budget covers core financial informationCity budgets (CityCites extraction), state filings
Spending detailHow much line-item and category detail the city publishesCity budgets, state filings

Accountability evidence exists for every US city. Disclosure evidence comes from budget documents CityCites collects, available for California cities today and expanding state by state; where it is not collected yet, the score uses accountability alone and shows lower completeness. Statements prepared on a state-required accounting basis are not counted against a city.

Cities without an audit on file

Federal single audits are required only for governments that spend $750,000 or more of federal money in a year. Not needing an audit is not a finding against a city: its audit components are left out, and the city is scored on its other evidence. A city with too little evidence gets no score rather than a low one.

Example

Worked example

San Ramon, CA

50k-150k residents · completeness 100% · medium confidence
64
16th percentile among 629 peers
Audit timeliness
0
Audit results
100
Financial reporting to the Census
84
Budget disclosure
87
Spending detail
100
Full San Ramon profile →

Distribution

050100

4,393 US cities. Highlighted bar: San Ramon (64).

Sources

Limitations

  • Transparency measures reporting, not financial health or good governance.
  • Audit filing dates come from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse; a corrected resubmission can carry a later date than the original filing.
  • Budget disclosure is collected for California cities today; other states are being added. Until then those cities are scored on accountability alone.
  • Meeting records and open-data portals are not yet part of the score.

Technical methodology

Technical methodology for partners

Data partners receive the full technical methodology: exact inputs, time windows, weights, normalization and validation rules, so their model-risk, compliance and data-science teams can review every score.

Request the technical methodology →